I've always been kinda hung up on authenticity and it tends to colour what music I like. I like unusual voices but I turn off if I think the style seems too forced -- like the recent procession of bands with crazy/old man vocals. There's something about singing in your normal voice that seems honest and genuine.
Of course this thinking's rigid and completely self-defeating. What I'm reacting to is probably not aesthetic conceit, but obvious aesthetic conceit; bad craft. Surely there's room to add a bit of colour. Not to mention that when I sing in my normal voice, I feel it's a little bland.
Something else occurred to me as I listened to the halting, whispering vocals of Doveman -- ordinarily I might've started thinking that perhaps the whisper was a little precious. But I remember that when I was trying to learn a new song recently I sung in a whisper 'cause I wasn't sure of the tune and didn't want to loudly commit to the wrong note. When you're using a softer voice, mistakes are less obvious and matter less. So it could be that singing softly allows more creativity. Like using scrap paper instead of a Moleskine journal when you're brainstorming visual ideas.
I started to like the whisper. And why shouldn't it be carried into the final version after the song's been finished? It sounds more interesting anyway.
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)